Threat Hunting

Proactive, hypothesis-driven hunting for adversaries that have evaded your automated defenses — MITRE ATT&CK aligned across endpoint, network, cloud, and identity.

MITRE ATT&CK Aligned
Framework-Based Hunts
Hypothesis-Led
Intelligence-Driven Methodology
30-Min MTTH Reduction
Faster Threat Discovery
Custom IOC Feeds
Real-Time Threat Intelligence
Hunt Methodology

Hypothesis · Analysis · Assessment

Three hunt modalities covering proactive hunting, behavioral analysis, and compromise assessments.

PROACTIVE HUNTING

Hypothesis-Driven Threat Hunting

We form intelligence-led hypotheses based on threat actor TTPs, MITRE ATT&CK techniques relevant to your sector, and active threat reports — then systematically hunt your telemetry to validate or disprove each hypothesis.

  • Campaign-specific hunts aligned to active threat actors
  • Insider threat and lateral movement detection
  • Persistence mechanism and scheduled task discovery
  • MITRE ATT&CK TTP coverage mapping per hunt
DATA ANALYSIS

Behavioral & Statistical Analysis

Using endpoint telemetry, network flow, and log analytics to find anomalies that indicate compromise — beaconing patterns, rare process executions, unusual auth sequences, and protocol deviations that automated tools miss.

  • Long-tail frequency analysis and baseline deviation
  • Beaconing and C2 communication pattern detection
  • User and entity behavior analytics (UEBA)
  • Protocol anomaly and DNS tunneling detection
COMPROMISE ASSESSMENT

IOC Sweeps & Compromise Assessment

A comprehensive sweep of your environment to answer the critical question: are you currently compromised? We run IOC sweeps, endpoint forensic scans, and network traffic analysis to detect active intrusions and dormant implants.

  • Endpoint forensic scan across entire fleet
  • Network traffic analysis for C2 and exfiltration
  • IOC sweep against threat intelligence feeds
  • Detailed compromise assessment report with remediation
Why Hunt

Alerts Miss 70% of What Attackers Do

Automated SIEM alerts detect known-bad patterns. APT groups and sophisticated attackers specifically design their operations to avoid those patterns — using legitimate system tools, blending into normal traffic, and operating below detection thresholds.

Threat hunting systematically searches for behaviors that are not inherently malicious but are statistically abnormal, or that match documented attacker tradecraft from MITRE ATT&CK and threat intelligence feeds.

21-day average dwell time before detection in enterprise environments. Threat hunting finds active intrusions weeks before automated tools would detect them.
Most SOC alert libraries cover fewer than 30% of MITRE ATT&CK techniques. Hunting extends coverage across the remaining 70% attackers rely on.
Experienced hunters typically find 2-3 unreported compromises for every 1 detected by automated alerting in the same environment.

21-Day Dwell Time Reduction

Threat hunting systematically reduces attacker dwell time by finding active intrusions weeks before automated tools detect them.

30% ATT&CK Coverage Gap

Most SOC alert libraries cover fewer than 30% of techniques. Hunting extends coverage across the remaining 70%.

2-3x More Compromises Found

Experienced hunters typically find 2-3 unreported compromises per automated detection in the same environment.

Permanent Detection Uplift

Every hunt finding converts into a permanent detection rule — each engagement increases your long-term detection coverage.

Our Process

5-Phase Threat Hunting Methodology

From hypothesis generation through active hunting, findings analysis, and detection engineering output.

01

Threat Intelligence & Hypothesis Generation

Analyzing current threat reports, ISAC feeds, and MITRE ATT&CK for techniques relevant to your industry vertical. Formulating prioritized hunt hypotheses ranked by likelihood and potential impact.

02

Data Source Mapping & Collection

Mapping required data sources against hypotheses — EDR telemetry, network flow, DNS logs, authentication logs, cloud audit trails. Ensuring sufficient logging fidelity before beginning active hunts.

03

Active Hunt Execution

Executing structured hunts across your environment using SIEM queries, EDR hunting queries, and notebook-based analytics. Each hunt is documented with hypothesis, methodology, evidence examined, and findings.

04

Findings Analysis & Escalation

Analyzing detected anomalies to determine true positive vs. benign. Escalating confirmed or suspected compromises with full forensic context. Documenting false positives to improve future detection logic.

05

Report & Detection Coverage Improvement

Delivering a threat hunting report covering scope, hypotheses tested, findings, and detection gaps. Converting confirmed hunt findings into permanent SIEM rules to prevent future recurrence of identified TTPs.

Hunt Coverage

Endpoint to Cloud Threat Hunting

Structured hunt coverage across every attack surface — endpoint, network, cloud, identity, and compromise assessments.

Endpoint Threat Hunting

EDR-based hunting across Windows, macOS, and Linux — process injection, credential dumping, registry persistence, service installation using CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, or any EDR.

Network Threat Hunting

Hunt across network flow, packet captures, and proxy logs for C2 beaconing, DNS tunneling, lateral movement via SMB/WMI/RDP, and exfiltration patterns invisible to perimeter firewalls.

Cloud Threat Hunting

Hunting across AWS CloudTrail, Azure Monitor, and GCP Audit Logs for cloud-specific TTPs — IAM privilege escalation, S3 exfiltration, resource abuse for cryptomining.

Identity & Authentication Hunting

Hunting for credential-based attacks — password spraying, Kerberoasting, pass-the-hash, impossible travel patterns, and OAuth token abuse across AD and cloud identity providers.

Compromise Assessment

Point-in-time sweep using proprietary IOC databases, threat actor tool signatures, and behavioral indicators. Answers: are we currently compromised by an active or dormant attacker?

Hunt Program Development

Building hunt libraries, MITRE ATT&CK coverage dashboards, data source requirements documentation, and analyst training programs for organizations building internal hunt teams.

Why Adayptus

Hunt Engagements That Leave Lasting Value

Every engagement produces permanent detection improvements — not just a one-time report.

MITRE ATT&CK Aligned

Every hunt maps to specific ATT&CK techniques. You receive a coverage heatmap showing which attacker techniques your environment can now detect.

IOC & TTP Coverage

We hunt against current threat intelligence — active campaign IOCs, known tool signatures (Cobalt Strike, Sliver), and TTPs targeting your industry.

Detection Engineering Output

Every confirmed TTP becomes a permanent SIEM rule or EDR detection in your environment — increasing detection coverage permanently.

Zero Tool Lock-In

We hunt in your environment using your existing SIEM, EDR, and log sources. Splunk, Elastic, Sentinel, CrowdStrike, SentinelOne — your stack, our expertise.

Hunt Platforms We Work With

Splunk
Elastic SIEM
Microsoft Sentinel
CrowdStrike
SentinelOne
Velociraptor
MITRE ATT&CK
YARA
Sigma Rules
FAQs

Frequently Asked Questions

Everything you need to know about threat hunting services

Get Started

Find Attackers Before They Find You

Proactive threat hunting is the highest-ROI investment in your detection program. Contact us to scope a hunt engagement for your environment.

Get in Touch

Ready to secure your future? Reach out to us for a consultation.